<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Robert Sturdy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertsturdymep.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertsturdymep.com</link>
	<description>Conservative MEP - UK Eastern Region.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:19:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inaugural EU Sri Lanka Business Council meeting creates business links between the EU and Sri Lanka by Credit card Sri lanka</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2013/02/19/inaugural-eu-sri-lanka-business-council-meeting-creates-business-links-between-the-eu-and-sri-lanka/#comment-1544</link>
		<dc:creator>Credit card Sri lanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=2158#comment-1544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this meeting was a useful one to develop the relationship between EU and Sri Lanka and hopefully I hope the relationship will be for ever and work on the development.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this meeting was a useful one to develop the relationship between EU and Sri Lanka and hopefully I hope the relationship will be for ever and work on the development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on European Commission proposes banning insecticides to save bees by Christopher Gait</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2013/01/31/european-commission-proposes-banning-insecticides-to-save-bees/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Gait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=2143#comment-1512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a resident and small scale beekeeper I would urge you to back a temporary ban on neonicotinoids pesticides, until there is a time when science can be certain of the results. After all Tabaco was thought to be beneficial and 50 years on we are still trying to eradicate the legacy. Yes science has moved on and circumstantial evidence suggests that these pesticides are safe. I have several hives in NW Spain in an area to poor to buy these fancy chemicals, therefore no neonicotinoids within foraging range and yet my colonies have died, I believe more research is needed to find for once and for all the cause or causes of colony decline.
I agree with your comments of protecting, the mainly arable farmers of this region but consideration must be given to the livestock farmer that relies on flowering fodder for his animals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a resident and small scale beekeeper I would urge you to back a temporary ban on neonicotinoids pesticides, until there is a time when science can be certain of the results. After all Tabaco was thought to be beneficial and 50 years on we are still trying to eradicate the legacy. Yes science has moved on and circumstantial evidence suggests that these pesticides are safe. I have several hives in NW Spain in an area to poor to buy these fancy chemicals, therefore no neonicotinoids within foraging range and yet my colonies have died, I believe more research is needed to find for once and for all the cause or causes of colony decline.<br />
I agree with your comments of protecting, the mainly arable farmers of this region but consideration must be given to the livestock farmer that relies on flowering fodder for his animals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tell us your red-tape problems by Robert</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2012/11/12/tell-us-your-red-tape-problems/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=2110#comment-1313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr Jones,

Thank you for contacting me with your red-tape problem as an electrician.

The legislation you mention, building regulations part P, falls under UK Government Planning rules. This time it is UK red-tape and not EU red-tape that is making your job more difficult. An impact assessment was recently carried out on Part P by the UK government; you can see the results here: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/49996/121217_-_Part_P_IA_-_to_publish_for_web.pdf

As this is not an EU issue, I can&#039;t do very much for you here in Brussels. Unfortunately, the period of public consultation has passed. Your best bet to cause change is to contact your local MP or the UK Department for Communities and Local Government. They will be able to inform more about how the issue is progressing and keep you updated on any further developments.

Yours sincerely,

Robert Sturdy MEP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Jones,</p>
<p>Thank you for contacting me with your red-tape problem as an electrician.</p>
<p>The legislation you mention, building regulations part P, falls under UK Government Planning rules. This time it is UK red-tape and not EU red-tape that is making your job more difficult. An impact assessment was recently carried out on Part P by the UK government; you can see the results here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/49996/121217_-_Part_P_IA_-_to_publish_for_web.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/49996/121217_-_Part_P_IA_-_to_publish_for_web.pdf</a></p>
<p>As this is not an EU issue, I can&#8217;t do very much for you here in Brussels. Unfortunately, the period of public consultation has passed. Your best bet to cause change is to contact your local MP or the UK Department for Communities and Local Government. They will be able to inform more about how the issue is progressing and keep you updated on any further developments.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely,</p>
<p>Robert Sturdy MEP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on European Commission proposes banning insecticides to save bees by Robert</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2013/01/31/european-commission-proposes-banning-insecticides-to-save-bees/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=2143#comment-1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr Rawlins,

Thank you for taking the time to comment on my press release. Please allow me to respond to some of your comments.

First of all, I acknowledge that the study by the Humbolt Forum of Food and Agriculture is only one study with one set of data results. Nevertheless, the UK government Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has looked into the problem and considered several recent studies. Their research found that &quot;none of the studies gives unequivocal evidence that sub-lethal effects with serious implications for colonies are likely to arise from current uses of neonicotinoids.&quot; It determined that the risk assessment of neonicotinoids could be updated in light of new developments in science; however, they also concluded that changing existing regulation would not be the best solution at the moment. Defra&#039;s report on neonicotinoids and bees from last September can be found here: http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb13818-neonicotinoid-bees-20120918.pdf

Nonetheless, as Vice-President of the Cambridgeshire Beekeepers&#039; Association, I am deeply concerned about the health of bees in the UK and in Europe. I do want the health of bees to be a top priority, as they play a very important role in agriculture and in the environment. However, I am a strong believer in the fact that a proportional and balanced response must be struck in order to protect bees. Banning the use of important insecticides could affect farming and food production and this point of view also needs to be considered when finding a way to protect bee health.

The Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament will have their say on the matter this week when the European Food Safety Authority gives a presentation to the Committee on Wednesday.

Yours sincerely,

Robert Sturdy MEP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Rawlins,</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to comment on my press release. Please allow me to respond to some of your comments.</p>
<p>First of all, I acknowledge that the study by the Humbolt Forum of Food and Agriculture is only one study with one set of data results. Nevertheless, the UK government Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has looked into the problem and considered several recent studies. Their research found that &#8220;none of the studies gives unequivocal evidence that sub-lethal effects with serious implications for colonies are likely to arise from current uses of neonicotinoids.&#8221; It determined that the risk assessment of neonicotinoids could be updated in light of new developments in science; however, they also concluded that changing existing regulation would not be the best solution at the moment. Defra&#8217;s report on neonicotinoids and bees from last September can be found here: <a href="http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb13818-neonicotinoid-bees-20120918.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb13818-neonicotinoid-bees-20120918.pdf</a></p>
<p>Nonetheless, as Vice-President of the Cambridgeshire Beekeepers&#8217; Association, I am deeply concerned about the health of bees in the UK and in Europe. I do want the health of bees to be a top priority, as they play a very important role in agriculture and in the environment. However, I am a strong believer in the fact that a proportional and balanced response must be struck in order to protect bees. Banning the use of important insecticides could affect farming and food production and this point of view also needs to be considered when finding a way to protect bee health.</p>
<p>The Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament will have their say on the matter this week when the European Food Safety Authority gives a presentation to the Committee on Wednesday.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely,</p>
<p>Robert Sturdy MEP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tell us your red-tape problems by Trevor Jones</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2012/11/12/tell-us-your-red-tape-problems/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=2110#comment-1188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr Sturdy, 
                                                               I am writing to you with a great concern of what I have seen about proposals to relax part P to only include new circuits, in order to cut red tape I am not just speaking for me but other electricians that I know.

Even though we have had Part P for some time now, I am still having to put up with poor  and sometimes dangerous work done by unqualified electricians weekly, on average once a month I stop a fire accruing the majority of which are not at the consumer unit.

Registering work for part P takes a few seconds this would not cut red tape at all, making certification for minor works easier would cut red tape just a simple tick and signing for that work to show that it has been completed to the regulations this would help cut red tape. 

As a struggling to make money electrician I feel greatly under appreciated by this new development.

I would suggest to add to part P, cooker and shower replacements and anything over 20 amps because of their large loads which are a fire hazards, not relax it. 

Maybe to encourage more electricians to register, and maybe to encourage consumers to use registered electricians a 10% tax Levy should be added to all wireable electrical goods, this could be done easily the same way Screwfix do to their electrical products. 

In my opinion the power of electricity should be given the respect it deserves.

Speaking to some electricians, they said that they would deregister if this went ahead.

Yours Faithfully

Trevor Jones]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Sturdy,<br />
                                                               I am writing to you with a great concern of what I have seen about proposals to relax part P to only include new circuits, in order to cut red tape I am not just speaking for me but other electricians that I know.</p>
<p>Even though we have had Part P for some time now, I am still having to put up with poor  and sometimes dangerous work done by unqualified electricians weekly, on average once a month I stop a fire accruing the majority of which are not at the consumer unit.</p>
<p>Registering work for part P takes a few seconds this would not cut red tape at all, making certification for minor works easier would cut red tape just a simple tick and signing for that work to show that it has been completed to the regulations this would help cut red tape. </p>
<p>As a struggling to make money electrician I feel greatly under appreciated by this new development.</p>
<p>I would suggest to add to part P, cooker and shower replacements and anything over 20 amps because of their large loads which are a fire hazards, not relax it. </p>
<p>Maybe to encourage more electricians to register, and maybe to encourage consumers to use registered electricians a 10% tax Levy should be added to all wireable electrical goods, this could be done easily the same way Screwfix do to their electrical products. </p>
<p>In my opinion the power of electricity should be given the respect it deserves.</p>
<p>Speaking to some electricians, they said that they would deregister if this went ahead.</p>
<p>Yours Faithfully</p>
<p>Trevor Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on European Commission proposes banning insecticides to save bees by Dave Rawlins</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2013/01/31/european-commission-proposes-banning-insecticides-to-save-bees/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rawlins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=2143#comment-1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1)	The Humboldt Forum for Food and Agriculture states that it is;
“an international non-profit think tank and represents a multidisciplinary expert international community, drawn from government, academia, industry and civil society and develops sustainable strategies to meet challenges of global food and agriculture”
In fact it is wholly funded by BASF SE, Bayer Crop Science, E.ON, KWS SAAT AG and Nestlé.  It is an outsourced publicity department.
2)	The Vice President of HFFA, Rainer von Mielecki, works for BASF SE as Head of Global Public/Government Affairs. Another member, Hans Jöhr, is Corporate Head of Agriculture at Nestlé.

3)	The authors, Dr. Noleppa and Dr. Hahn, acknowledge that the study was paid for by Bayer Crop Science and Syngenta  manufacturers of neonicotinoid pesticides

4)	The figure of 50,000 job losses (as full time equivalents) is a worst case scenario after 5 years. The EU Commission is proposing a two year ban followed by a review.

5)	The proposal is to ban three named neonicotinoids from use on crops that are attractive to bees. Rapeseed, sunflowers, maize and cotton have been given as examples. The study, in the worst case scenario, looked at winter wheat, barley, and sugarbeet crops that are not attractive to bees, as well as maize, rapeseed , sunflowers thus inflating the detrimental effects of a ban

6)	I cannot find a specific figure of a “cost to the EU economy up to €4.5 billion a year” in the study but note that it takes no account of the Commission’s estimate of the €22 billion per year contribution of pollinators to European agriculture, with 84 percent of crops needing insect pollination.

7)	The statement “A ban on these insecticides could reduce yields of some key crops by 20%” is supported by the study but assumes that “ no other currently available corresponding crop protection technology would be used on areas where NNi (neonicotinoids) are deployed now” This is extremely unlikely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)	The Humboldt Forum for Food and Agriculture states that it is;<br />
“an international non-profit think tank and represents a multidisciplinary expert international community, drawn from government, academia, industry and civil society and develops sustainable strategies to meet challenges of global food and agriculture”<br />
In fact it is wholly funded by BASF SE, Bayer Crop Science, E.ON, KWS SAAT AG and Nestlé.  It is an outsourced publicity department.<br />
2)	The Vice President of HFFA, Rainer von Mielecki, works for BASF SE as Head of Global Public/Government Affairs. Another member, Hans Jöhr, is Corporate Head of Agriculture at Nestlé.</p>
<p>3)	The authors, Dr. Noleppa and Dr. Hahn, acknowledge that the study was paid for by Bayer Crop Science and Syngenta  manufacturers of neonicotinoid pesticides</p>
<p>4)	The figure of 50,000 job losses (as full time equivalents) is a worst case scenario after 5 years. The EU Commission is proposing a two year ban followed by a review.</p>
<p>5)	The proposal is to ban three named neonicotinoids from use on crops that are attractive to bees. Rapeseed, sunflowers, maize and cotton have been given as examples. The study, in the worst case scenario, looked at winter wheat, barley, and sugarbeet crops that are not attractive to bees, as well as maize, rapeseed , sunflowers thus inflating the detrimental effects of a ban</p>
<p>6)	I cannot find a specific figure of a “cost to the EU economy up to €4.5 billion a year” in the study but note that it takes no account of the Commission’s estimate of the €22 billion per year contribution of pollinators to European agriculture, with 84 percent of crops needing insect pollination.</p>
<p>7)	The statement “A ban on these insecticides could reduce yields of some key crops by 20%” is supported by the study but assumes that “ no other currently available corresponding crop protection technology would be used on areas where NNi (neonicotinoids) are deployed now” This is extremely unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pakistan flood assistance passes final hurdle by Garry Parker</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2012/09/13/pakistan-flood-assistance-passes-final-hurdle/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=2086#comment-937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Robert,

Good response on this.  

I need to talk to you about the ECR DSG Position, which I have applied for having been tipped off by someone we know.

I&#039;ve left a message for Giles and Malcolm in Brussels and mobiles but I have mislaid yours...tut,tut!

Would be grateful if you could give me a call when you&#039;re back in Brussels: +358 466 220 381 (mobile).

Best regards,

Garry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>Good response on this.  </p>
<p>I need to talk to you about the ECR DSG Position, which I have applied for having been tipped off by someone we know.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve left a message for Giles and Malcolm in Brussels and mobiles but I have mislaid yours&#8230;tut,tut!</p>
<p>Would be grateful if you could give me a call when you&#8217;re back in Brussels: +358 466 220 381 (mobile).</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Garry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update: Going Global Trade Conference, Cambridge University, Friday 2nd March 2012 – Registration Open Now – Register FREE Today! by Robert Doak</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2012/02/13/update-going-global-trade-conference-friday-2nd-march-2012-registration-open-now-register-free-today/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Doak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=1808#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An international trade adviser for UKTI who has a number of key accounts who are increasingly penetrating the full range of global markets. Typically tackling FSU states; smaller markets of SE Asia, West and central Africa; etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An international trade adviser for UKTI who has a number of key accounts who are increasingly penetrating the full range of global markets. Typically tackling FSU states; smaller markets of SE Asia, West and central Africa; etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robert Sturdy attacks plans to force EU flag on sport shirts by Robert Sturdy</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2011/07/14/robert-sturdy-attacks-plans-to-force-eu-flag-on-sport-shirts/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sturdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=1375#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your response to my post. The purpose of my original post was not part of the ongoing pro- and anti- Europe dialogue, but simply to highlight the often pointless and regularly burdensome proposals and directives that emanate from the EU on a daily basis. In fact, if you look at my press release from the 5th of October you can see me praising the recent EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement as being good for Britain and the EU.

In the tough economic times that we currently find ourselves, the EU should not waste time and money on irrelevant schemes such as whether or not national sports teams wear the EU flag, but should concentrate on economic growth and job creation. Further regulation red tape will not help this.

With regards to your point on the growing support in the UK for further interaction and constructive action by our leaders, I am afraid that I do not agree with you.  Polls have indicated that there has been a steady trend, not just in the UK, but throughout Europe, towards a growing disenchantment with the EU, precisely because of proposals such as this.

Yours sincerely,

Robert Sturdy MEP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your response to my post. The purpose of my original post was not part of the ongoing pro- and anti- Europe dialogue, but simply to highlight the often pointless and regularly burdensome proposals and directives that emanate from the EU on a daily basis. In fact, if you look at my press release from the 5th of October you can see me praising the recent EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement as being good for Britain and the EU.</p>
<p>In the tough economic times that we currently find ourselves, the EU should not waste time and money on irrelevant schemes such as whether or not national sports teams wear the EU flag, but should concentrate on economic growth and job creation. Further regulation red tape will not help this.</p>
<p>With regards to your point on the growing support in the UK for further interaction and constructive action by our leaders, I am afraid that I do not agree with you.  Polls have indicated that there has been a steady trend, not just in the UK, but throughout Europe, towards a growing disenchantment with the EU, precisely because of proposals such as this.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely,</p>
<p>Robert Sturdy MEP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robert Sturdy attacks plans to force EU flag on sport shirts by pro-european</title>
		<link>http://robertsturdymep.com/2011/07/14/robert-sturdy-attacks-plans-to-force-eu-flag-on-sport-shirts/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>pro-european</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertsturdymep.com/?p=1375#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope you and other politicians in the UK open your eyes one day and realize the benefits that EU membership brings to the UK.  I think there are more and more people in the UK who would like to see further integration and constructive actions by our UK leaders rather than seing them constantly using Europe to gain far right votes at home.  On a personal note, one of the reasons I&#039;ve decided not to vote conservatives is due to their luck of support and commitment towards building a better and greater Europe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you and other politicians in the UK open your eyes one day and realize the benefits that EU membership brings to the UK.  I think there are more and more people in the UK who would like to see further integration and constructive actions by our UK leaders rather than seing them constantly using Europe to gain far right votes at home.  On a personal note, one of the reasons I&#8217;ve decided not to vote conservatives is due to their luck of support and commitment towards building a better and greater Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
